The Polkadot ecosystem is facing a set of unique challenges in the Web3 ecosystem. To start, it is facing a funding crisis. A recent report released by the Polkadot Treasury for the first half of 2024 has raised concerns over another collapse like FTX.
One use on X Web3 Philosopher by the tag @seunlanlege writes, “It’s insane to me how much money the Polkadot treasury is wasting on misplaced marketing. Did we learn nothing from FTX and http://crypto.com?”
Polkadot faces reputable challenges
There is an uproar in the crypto community especially Web3 concerning Polkadot. Let’s unpack victorji.eth on X, the man behind Manta CeDeFi and the founder of the previous largest (non-DOT) TVL in the Polkadot ecosystem, tweeted ,“I have to say that we do not want to engage with the Polkadot ecosystem and team at all. “
Victor alleges that the Polkadot ecosystem is “highly toxic ecosystem that lacks any real value for Web3.” He adds that some developers are “simply too busy to disclose the many facts about the discrimination we have faced as Asian founders in this ecosystem.”
Another user on X tied to Polkadot’s DIN project adds, “You have to face and solve many additional issues, such as politics, relationships, and cliques. […] Thus, we gradually distanced ourselves from the Polkadot ecosystem.
Polkadot has also been criticized for spending as much as $87 million in a year, $37 million of which was spent on marketing. According to the team, they spent the money to attract new users, developers, and businesses.
Clearly, that has not worked, as many developers are exiting Polkadot. In addition, the entity spent $10 million on ads, $4.4 million of which was paid to influencers, and $4 million on digital ads. However, despite that social media exposure expenditure, Polkadot’s visibility remains low.
Also Read: Shiba Inu price eyes higher ground after massive token burn